Hmm

Match.com’s physical attraction test thinks this guy is “my type”:

[image link broken, alas!]

Interesting. He’s good looking, but he’s not the most attractive guy I thought I saw in the test. Goes to show how much they know.

currently: about to take a shower

update: I took one about women, too, just to see how my results came out. Erik and I disagree greatly about what makes a beautiful woman. Let’s see… according to the test, this is the woman I find most attractive:

[image link broken, of course]

Eh. Same comment as for the men: there were definitely women I found more attractive in the test. Oh but wait. There’s another type of woman who has what they call “unique traits”: I find her attractive but a lot of other people might not. Here she is:

[broken]

I am also pickier about women than men. Huh.

It’s funny, though, now that I think about it. I don’t know about men, but my taste in women has definitely changed over the years. In high school I thought Gwyneth Paltrow was the epitome of female attractiveness: tall, slender, elegant, smooth, perhaps a bit aloof. Now my female ideal, given that I like my own looks a lot, comes a lot closer to Santia in my dance class: extremely strong but incredibly graceful and stunningly elegant, active, with a generous smile.

[This post was imported on 4/10/14 from my old blog at satsumabug.livejournal.com.]

Advertisements

5 responses to “Hmm

  1. I took that test too, and I gotta say, it seemed rather inaccurate. Although I suppose it was difficult to gauge me since I didn’t find many of the men that attractive at all. As I kept clicking through, it was one “eh” after another. I should try taking the women version. From the pictures you’ve posted, it seems the choices there are better. ;P

  2. according to the test, 66% of average women are not at all attracted to the type of guys i find attractive. (whoohoo! that’s in my favor! πŸ˜‰ hahaha…..) i apparently go for the all-american boyish next door look or the “pretty boy” look. and the tall skinny guy look. apparently. gooodnesss! hehe the test didn’t really reveal anything i didn’t already know, in fact it got a lot of things wrong too. but it was kind of fun πŸ™‚

    • Re:

      shoot! – that was al. you know lisa, you could probably safely assume that if it doesn’t have a signature it’s me πŸ˜› because i keep forgetting to sign my name.. haha!

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s